Abstract: To study the strategy of carbon emission reduction research and development between supply chains under consumer subsidy,two supply chains consisted of two manufactures and a retailer were taken as objects to construct government subsidized consumer model and models of choosing non-cooperation strategy,semi-cooperation strategy and fully cooperation strategy by supply chains.By comparing the changes of net carbon emissions of each supply chain,profits of manufactures and profits of each supply chain,the strategies of carbon emission reduction research and development between supply chains were found.The result showed that the non-cooperation strategy was identical with semi-cooperation strategy from the view of net carbon emissions,these two strategies and full cooperation strategy might become the optimal choice or the second best choice between supply chains.From the view of profits of manufactures,full cooperation strategy might become the second best choice between supply chains,but non-cooperation strategy and semi-cooperation strategy might become the optimal choice or the second best choice between supply chains.From the view of profits of each supply chain,only non-cooperation strategy and semi-cooperation strategy might become the optimal choice or the second best choice between supply chains.Generally speaking,only non-cooperation strategy and semi-cooperation strategy might become the stable optimal choice or the stable second best choice between supply chains.

Key words: consumer subsidy, carbon emission reduction research and development, non-cooperation, semi-cooperation, full cooperation, supply chains

摘要： 为研究政府提供消费者补贴下供应链间减排研发策略选择问题,以两个制造商和一个零售商组成的两个供应链为研究对象,分别构建了政府补贴消费者以及供应链间选择不合作、半合作和完全合作的模型,并比较了供应链的净碳排放量、制造商的利润和供应链的利润变化,得出了供应链间的策略。结果表明：从净碳排放量看,不合作与半合作的效果相同,与完全合作均可能成为最优策略或次优策略;从制造商的利润看,完全合作可能成为次优策略,不合作和半合作均可能成为最优策略或次优策略;从各供应链的利润看,仅不合作和半合作可能成为最优策略或次优策略;综合看,仅不合作和半合作可成为稳定的最优策略或次优策略。

关键词: 消费者补贴, 减排研发, 不合作, 半合作, 完全合作, 供应链