复杂产品设计变更传播路径的多目标优选

doi:10.13196/j.cims.2021.03.016

计算机集成制造系统 ›› 2021, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 842-856.DOI: 10.13196/j.cims.2021.03.016

复杂产品设计变更传播路径的多目标优选

李从东^1,2,章志伟¹⁺,曹策俊³,张帆顺¹

1.暨南大学管理学院
2.暨南大学物联网与物流工程研究院
3.重庆工商大学管理科学与工程学院

出版日期:2021-03-31 发布日期:2021-03-31
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71672074,71904021);国家自然科学基金面上资助项目(72072072);重庆市社会科学规划资助项目(2019QNGL27);教育部“春晖计划”合作科研资助项目(CQ2019001);重庆市自然科学基金资助项目(cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0164);重庆市教委科学技术研究资助项目(KJQN201900830);重庆工商大学“应对重大突发公共卫生事件”专题研究重点资助项目(ctbuyqzx01);重庆工商大学引进高层次人才科研启动资助项目(1955011);重庆工商大学校内科研资助项目(1951025);广州市创新领军团队资助项目(201909010006)。

Multi-objective optimization of design change propagation paths in complex product

Online:2021-03-31 Published:2021-03-31
Supported by:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation,China (No.71672074,71904021,72072072),the Social Science Planning in Chongqing Municipality,China (No.2019QNGL27),the ‘Chunhui Plan’ of the Ministry of Education,China (No.CQ2019001),the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing Municipality,China (No.cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0164),the Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission,China (No.KJQN201900830),the Key Project of Special Research Regarding ‘Response to Major Public Health Emergency’ of Chongqing Technology and Business University,China(No.ctbuyqzx01),the Scientific Research Start up Foundation for Introduction of Advanced Talents in Chongqing Technology and Business University,China (No.1955011),the Research Foundation of Chongqing Technology and Business University,China(No.1951025),and the 2018 Guangzhou Leading Innoration Team Program,China(No.201909010006).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在防范复杂产品设计变更雪崩式传播时,为了减少变更传播对研发时间和设计成本产生的负面影响,提出一种面向设计变更传播路径的多目标优选方法。首先,引入“功能-行为-结构(FBS)”模型和多重网络理论对设计变更传播路径进行表达。然后,以包括节点全面距离、加权聚集系数、边介数以及传播概率在内的路径变更传播强度(PCPI)、变更任务执行时间和变更成本最小化为优化目标,建立多目标0-1整数规划模型。进一步,采用改进遗传算法(IGA)求解所建立的模型。最后,通过家用分体式空调主机的设计变更来验证所提方法的可行性和有效性。结果表明：①路径变更传播强度、变更任务执行时间和变更成本明显影响复杂产品设计变更传播路径的优选方案;②将三者同时纳入到设计变更传播路径的优选活动中有助于限制变更传播影响、加快产品上市时间以及降低产品成本。

关键词: 复杂产品, 设计变更, 传播路径, 多重网络, 0-1整数规划模型, 改进遗传算法

Abstract: When prevent avalanche propagation of design change regarding complex product,to reduce the negative impacts of change propagation on Research and Development (R & D) time of as well as design cost,a multi-objective optimization method for design change propagation paths was proposed.Design change propagation paths were characterized by Function-Behavior-Structure (FBS) model and multi-plex network theory.Aiming at minimizing lead-time of change task,design cost and Path Change Propagation Intensity (PCPI) including full distance of node,weighted aggregation coefficient,edge betweenness and propagation probability,a multi-objective 0-1 integer programming model was established,which was solved by Improved Genetic Algorithm (GA).A case study from household air condition host was considered to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed approach.Results showed that the optimization scheme regarding design change propagation paths of complex product was significantly affected by path change propagation intensity,lead-time of change task and design cost.Furthermore,it also indicated that the incorporation of the aforementioned three factors into the optimization activities concerning design change propagation paths was beneficial for the limitation of design change propagation impacts,acceleration of product time-to-market,and reduction of product cost.

Key words: complex product, design change, propagation paths, multiplex network, 0-1 integer programming model, improved genetic algorithm

中图分类号:

TH136

李从东,章志伟,曹策俊,张帆顺. 复杂产品设计变更传播路径的多目标优选[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(3): 842-856.

[1]	曹远冲,熊辉,庄存波,刘检华,宁伟航. 基于数字孪生的复杂产品离散装配车间动态调度[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(2): 557-568.
[2]	易扬,冯锦丹,刘金山,陈长江,刘晓军,倪中华. 复杂产品数字孪生装配模型表达与精度预测[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(2): 617-630.
[3]	胡兴,刘检华,庄存波,武颖,张雷,熊辉. 基于数字孪生的复杂产品装配过程管控方法与应用[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(2): 642-653.
[4]	潘燕华,王克,王平. 云计算环境下复杂产品价值链合作伙伴选择研究[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(12): 3651-3658.
[5]	陈宗衡,华尔天,李生辉. 面向产品结构的多变更传播路径的并行搜索方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(10): 2981-2989.
[6]	李敬花,曹旺,赵定刚,蒋岩,周青骅. 基于改进遗传算法的托盘拣选延误时间优化[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2020, 26(第2): 340-355.
[7]	王建,黎荣,武浩远,丁国富,郑宇飞. 按单设计型复杂产品的配置设计技术综述[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2020, 26(第2): 410-425.
[8]	郭钧,朱文豪,杜百岗,李益兵,王磊,郭顺生. 考虑协同效应的复杂产品系统绿色供应商多阶段选择方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2020, 26(9): 2573-2589.
[9]	郭伟飞,宋豫川,周璠,雷琦,吕向飞. 基于逆序虚拟零部件的紧密衔接综合调度算法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2020, 26(12): 3313-3328.
[10]	李浩,陶飞,王昊琪,宋文燕,张在房,樊蓓蓓,武春龙,李玉鹏,李琳利,文笑雨,张新生,罗国富. 基于数字孪生的复杂产品设计制造一体化开发框架与关键技术[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2019, 25(第6): 1320-1336.
[11]	武颖,姚丽亚,熊辉,庄存波,赵浩然,刘检华. 基于数字孪生技术的复杂产品装配过程质量管控方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2019, 25(第6): 1568-1575.
[12]	杨新宇,胡业发. 复杂产品MRO协同服务链建模与不确定性分析方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2019, 25(第2): 326-339.
[13]	刘春玲,王俊峰,黎继子,周钰萍. 众包模式下冷链物流配送模型的仿真和优化分析[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2019, 25(第10): 2666-2675.
[14]	阴艳超,张立童,廖伟智. 多维知识资源云协同的服务行为建模[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2019, 25(12): 3149-3159.
[15]	张新卫,李靖,同淑荣. 面向复杂产品系统供应商的价值驱动需求建立[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2018, 24(第6): 1503-1510.

复杂产品设计变更传播路径的多目标优选

Multi-objective optimization of design change propagation paths in complex product

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics