计算机集成制造系统 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (9): 3123-3137.DOI: 10.13196/j.cims.2023.09.023

• • 上一篇    下一篇

政府基金政策下动力电池闭环供应链回收渠道选择

龚本刚1,高一凌1,刘志1,2+,程永宏1,郑小雪3   

  1. 1.安徽工程大学经济与管理学院
    2.上海大学悉尼工商学院
    3.闽江学院新华都商学院
  • 出版日期:2023-09-30 发布日期:2023-10-18
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(72071002,71801003,72001041);安徽省高校杰出青年科研资助项目(2023AH020016)。

Selection of recycling channels in power battery closed-loop supply chain under government fund policy

GONG Bengang1,GAO Yiling1,LIU Zhi1,2+,CHENG Yonghong1,ZHENG Xiaoxue3   

  1. 1.School of Economics and Management,Anhui Polytechnic University
    2.School of SHU-UTS Business,Shanghai University
    3.School of New Huadu Business,Minjiang University
  • Online:2023-09-30 Published:2023-10-18
  • Supported by:
    Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation,China(72071002,71801003,72001041),and the Outstanding Youth Research Project in Anhui Provincial Universities,China(No.2023AH020016).

摘要: 随着新能源汽车动力电池报废潮来袭,我国动力电池回收利用行业已步入回收政策体系建设和渠道建设的关键时期。为分析政府政策对报废动力电池回收渠道的影响,考虑将动力电池的生态设计水平与回收数量作为奖励因子的政府基金政策,研究在该政策下动力电池闭环供应链回收渠道的选择问题。构建有无政府基金政策影响的6种动力电池闭环供应链回收渠道模型,分析政府基金政策对最优决策、利润和环境效益的影响,研究基金政策与社会总福利和政府财政收支的关系,并从不同成员的偏好角度讨论最佳回收渠道。研究结果表明:政府实施基金政策会提高生态设计水平,环境效益以及供应链中各成员的利润;制造商与零售商都青睐于制造商回收渠道,第三方回收企业希望独自承担回收活动,而消费者选择零售商或第三方企业回收会获得更高的差价;政府从社会福利角度偏向于制造商回收,但制造商回收渠道不利于财政收支平衡角度。

关键词: 闭环供应链, 废旧动力电池, 回收渠道, 政府基金, 生态设计

Abstract: With the scarp tide of new energy vehicle power battery,China's power battery recycling industry has entered the key period of recycling policy system construction and channel construction.To analyze the impact of government policy on the recycling channels of scrap power,the ecological design level and recycling of power batteries was considered as a government fund policy of reward factors,and the choice of power battery closed-loop supply chain recycling channels in this policy was studied.Six power-based battery closed-loop supply chain recycling channel models with or without government fund policies were constructed,the impact of government fund policy on equilibrium decisions,economic and environmental performance was analyzed,the relationship between government fund policy and social welfare with government receipts was researched,and the best recovery channels from the perspective of different members was discussed.The results showed that the fund policy implemented by the government could improve the level of ecological design,environmental benefits and the profit of each member of the closed-loop supply chain.Manufacturer and retailer both favored the manufacturer's recycling channel.Third-party recycling company hoped to undertake recycling activities alone,and consumers who chose retailer or third-party recycling company to recycle would get a higher price difference.The government preferred manufacturer to recycle from the perspective of social welfare,but the recycling channel of manufacturer was not conducive to the perspective of fiscal balance.

Key words: closed-loop supply chain, used power batteries, recycling channels, government funds, ecological design

中图分类号: