基于图重写规则的可重构机床配置规划

• 论文 •

基于图重写规则的可重构机床配置规划

曾法力，李爱平，谢楠，徐立云

1.同济大学现代制造技术研究所，上海200092；2.同济大学中德工程学院，上海200092

出版日期:2011-08-15 发布日期:2011-08-25

Configuration planning of reconfigurable machine tools based on graph rewriting rule

ZENG Fa-li, LI Ai-ping, XIE Nan, XU Li-yun

1.Institute of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China；2.Sino-German University of Applied Sciences, Tongji University,, Shanghai 200092, China

Online:2011-08-15 Published:2011-08-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 根据可重构机床配置生成机理与图重写规则的重写操作相似性，提出了一种基于图重写规则的可重构配置规划方法。利用图重写规则对节点有无标志、边的标志属性和图表示有向、无向等约定进行操作，提高了制造系统的快速结构配置响应能力。通过图重写和变量重写规则，展示了图重写规则在重构过程中的优点。通过对可重构机床广义模型进行图分解、图重写和重构，表明该方法可以有效地对可重构机床进行快速配置规划，提升重构斜升时间。

关键词: 可重构机床, 图重写, 配置规划, 图文法, 模块, 机床

Abstract: According to the similarity between inborn mechanism of reconfigurable machine tools configuration and rewriting operation of graph rewriting rules, a reconfigurable configuration planning method based on graph rewriting rule was proposed. The rapid structure configuration response capability of manufacturing system was improved by using graph rewriting rule to operate stipulations such as node identifier and identifier attribute of edge, denoted direction and non-direction of graph. The advantages of graph rewriting rule in the course of reconfiguration were revealed according to graph rewriting and variant rewriting rule. Through the graph decomposition, graph rewriting and reconfiguration, it indicated that this method could conduct effective configuration planning to reconfigurable machine tools and improve slanting time of reconfiguration.

Key words: reconfigurable machine tools, graph rewriting, configuration planning, graph grammar, module, machine tools

中图分类号:

F273.2

曾法力，李爱平，谢楠，徐立云. 基于图重写规则的可重构机床配置规划[J]. .

ZENG Fa-li, LI Ai-ping, XIE Nan, XU Li-yun. Configuration planning of reconfigurable machine tools based on graph rewriting rule[J]. .

[1]	王子生,姜兴宇,刘伟军,石敏煊,杨世奇,杨国哲. 再制造机床装配过程误差传递模型与精度预测[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(5): 1300-1308.
[2]	代康,张松,舒雨,张伟,张振. 数控机床平动轴几何误差辨识方法改进[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(5): 1319-1327.
[3]	杜彦斌,吴国奥,许磊. 基于神经网络和再制造因子的再制造机床可靠性分配方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(4): 1052-1061.
[4]	马艳,李方义,王黎明,王耿. 基于多层级数据分配的机床生命周期环境影响评价[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(3): 757-769.
[5]	宋思蒙,蒋增强,马靖,王强,赵志彪. 基于数字孪生的模块化生产系统运行机制及重构方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(2): 510-520.
[6]	张雷,刘检华,庄存波,王勇. 基于数字孪生的多轴数控机床轮廓误差抑制方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(12): 3391-3402.
[7]	张妮,赵晓冬. 基于改进质量功能展开的产品可持续设计模块重要度判定[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(12): 3614-3624.
[8]	钟泽杉,杨敏,赵现朝,岳义,时云,杨天豪. 轴空间多约束下的五轴B样条路径速度规划[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(1): 138-149.
[9]	李冬冬,张立强,杨乐. 基于FIR滤波的拐角轮廓误差精确插补算法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(1): 173-182.
[10]	程贤福,万冲,邱浩洋,万丽云. 模块化产品设计中模块间的关联分析与解耦策略[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2020, 26(第4): 1043-1051.
[11]	刘华一,鄢萍,周强,辛洋,张自凯,潘吉财. 基于语义网的机床故障诊断知识扩展方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2020, 26(第3): 609-622.
[12]	何彦,陈文奇,王禹林,岳冠楠,李育锋,田小成. 集成设计参数和制造参数的车削工件机加工能耗预测方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2020, 26(9): 2355-2366.
[13]	郭世杰,梅雪松,姜歌东. 基于平面光栅的机床几何误差测量与辨识[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2020, 26(8): 2037-2049.
[14]	戴怡,刘琴. 基于生存分析与极大似然法的可靠性评估[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2020, 26(11): 2976-2981.
[15]	徐斌,冯钧,潘瑞林,郜振华. 基于日志的数控机床生产信息自动化获取方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2019, 25(第7): 1739-1745.