基于平面光栅的机床几何误差测量与辨识

doi:10.13196/j.cims.2020.08.004

计算机集成制造系统 ›› 2020, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (8): 2037-2049.DOI: 10.13196/j.cims.2020.08.004

基于平面光栅的机床几何误差测量与辨识

郭世杰^1,2,梅雪松²,姜歌东²⁺

1.内蒙古工业大学机械工程学院
2.西安交通大学机械工程学院

出版日期:2020-08-31 发布日期:2020-08-31
基金资助:
内蒙古自然科学基金资助项目(2019BS05008);中央引导地方科技发展计划资助项目(2020ZY0002);长江学者和创新团队发展计划资助项目(IRT_15R54)。

Geometric error measurement and identification of machine tool based on gross grid encoder

Online:2020-08-31 Published:2020-08-31
Supported by:
Project supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region,China(No.2019BS05008),the Science and Technology Development Special Program of Central Guide the Local Government,China(No.2020ZY0002),and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education,China(No.IRT_15R54).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 几何误差是影响数控机床准静态精度的重要因素,针对几何误差测量、辨识问题,提出基于平面光栅的面—线机床空间几何误差辨识方法。依据多体系统理论和齐次坐标变换方法建立了三轴数控机床21项几何误差元素与3项误差向量之间的映射关系;规划了3个相互垂直的平面内的测量路径和辨识方案,通过单轴运动和两轴联动的形式可连续测量每个平面内的5条直线,进而依次确定垂直度、俯仰和偏摆误差、定位及直线度误差、滚转误差,减少了多次安装过程中安装误差累积对测量结果的影响;通过基于面—线法的21项几何误差测量和辨识实验,并与基于激光干涉仪测量辨识结果对比显示,平面光栅测量结果与激光干涉测量结果的空间误差向量最大偏差为2.4 μm,平均偏差为0.77 μm,验证了该方法对辨识机床精度是准确、有效的。

关键词: 数控机床, 几何误差, 面&mdash, 线法, 几何误差测量, 误差辨识

Abstract: Geometric error plays an important role that affecting the quasi-static accuracy of CNC machine tools.Aiming at the geometric error measurement and identification,plane-line based on Gross Grid Encoder (GGE) identification method was proposed.Based on multi-body system theory and homogeneous coordinate transformation method,the functional relationship between 21 geometric error and 3 error vectors of three-axis CNC machine tools was established.Three measurement paths and identification schemes in mutually perpendicular planes were planned.Through the single-axis motion and the two-axis synchronous motion,five straight lines in each plane were continuously measured to determine each geometric error in sequence.The impact of the accumulation of installation errors could be effectively reduced on the results during multiple installations.With the experiment of 21 geometric errors measurement and identification,the result showed that the maximum deviation of spatial error vector between the measurement result of plane-line and the laser interferometer result was 2.4 μm,and the average deviation was 0.77 μm,thus the effectiveness of the proposed method for identifying geometric error of machine tools was verified.

Key words: CNC machine tool, geometric error, plane-line method, geometric error measurement, error identification

中图分类号:

TH161
TG159

郭世杰,梅雪松,姜歌东. 基于平面光栅的机床几何误差测量与辨识[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2020, 26(8): 2037-2049.

[1]	代康,张松,舒雨,张伟,张振. 数控机床平动轴几何误差辨识方法改进[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(5): 1319-1327.
[2]	张雷,刘检华,庄存波,王勇. 基于数字孪生的多轴数控机床轮廓误差抑制方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(12): 3391-3402.
[3]	何坤,何晓虎,徐凯,王时龙,廖承渝. 基于参数化建模的球杆仪安装误差与直线轴几何误差分离方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(12): 3475-3483.
[4]	何彦,陈文奇,王禹林,岳冠楠,李育锋,田小成. 集成设计参数和制造参数的车削工件机加工能耗预测方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2020, 26(9): 2355-2366.
[5]	夏长久,王时龙,孙守利,林晓川,黄筱调. 五轴数控成形磨齿机几何误差—齿面误差模型及关键误差识别[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2020, 26(5期): 1191-1201.
[6]	戴怡,刘琴. 基于生存分析与极大似然法的可靠性评估[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2020, 26(11): 2976-2981.
[7]	徐斌,冯钧,潘瑞林,郜振华. 基于日志的数控机床生产信息自动化获取方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2019, 25(第7): 1739-1745.
[8]	李志杰,蔡力钢,刘志峰. 加加速度连续的S型加减速规划算法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2019, 25(第5): 1192-1201.
[9]	郭安,于东,胡毅,李浩. 基于FFSM的数控机床加工状态建模方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2019, 25(第1): 71-80.
[10]	江雪梅,陶媛媛,娄平,严俊伟,张小梅,胡缉伟. 数控机床热误差预测模型的评估方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2019, 25(第1): 81-89.
[11]	万姗,李东波,何非,童一飞. 数控机床维护服务过程中的知识重用[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2018, 24(第9): 2254-2269.
[12]	周丽蓉,李方义,李剑峰,成昌龙,孔琳. 一种考虑工件材料表面硬度的铣床功率模型[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2018, 24(第4): 905-916.
[13]	胡胜海,张满慧,周超,刘秀莲. 数控火焰切割机的加工误差实时补偿[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2018, 24(第3): 620-630.
[14]	王扬,张根保. 基于用户期望符合度的数控机床质量评价及控制策略[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2018, 24(第11): 2743-2750.
[15]	高峰,朱延炎,解瑞东,周飞,李艳. 基于等弓高误差法的双回转台五轴数控加工后置处理器开发[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2017, 23(第6期): 1296-1301.

基于平面光栅的机床几何误差测量与辨识

Geometric error measurement and identification of machine tool based on gross grid encoder

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics