基于灰色系统理论的质量屋中动态需求的分析与预测

• 论文 •

基于灰色系统理论的质量屋中动态需求的分析与预测

李中凯，冯毅雄，谭建荣，方辉,

1.浙江大学流体传动及控制国家重点实验室，浙江杭州310027;2.中国矿业大学机电工程学院，江苏徐州221116；3.四川大学制造科学与工程学院，四川成都610065

出版日期:2009-11-15 发布日期:2009-11-25

Analysis and prediction for dynamic requirements in house of quality based on grey theory

LI Zhong-kai，FENG Yi-xiong， TAN Jian-rong，FANG Hui,

1.State key Lab of Fluid Power Transmission and Control, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027,China;2.School of Mechatronics Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China;3.School of Manufacturing Scinece & Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China

Online:2009-11-15 Published:2009-11-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对质量功能配置中需求重要度分析方法的不足，提出了多属性决策与趋势预测集成的质量屋动态需求分析方法。通过分析需求信息的模糊性、个性化和阶段多变性等动态特征，将灰色系统理论引入需求处理过程，以数据获取、多属性决策和趋势预测为基本模块，构建了质量屋动态需求分析与预测的集成模型。将客户和市场竞争因素调查作为数据源，完成基础数据采集，引入灰关联度分析方法，进行客户需求和技术需求重要度分析，运用GM(1,1)模型获取需求重要度的近期发展趋势知识，实现质量功能配置中需求信息的采集、分析和预测。最后，以大型空分成套装备的需求分析为例，验证了该方法的可行性和有效性。

关键词: 质量功能配置, 灰色系统理论, 灰关联度分析, 趋势预测, 多属性决策

Abstract: Aiming at the deficiencies of requirements'importance analysis in Quality Function Deployment (QFD), a dynamic requirements'analysis method in house of quality was put forward by integrating multi-attribute decision and trend prediction. By analyzing the requirements'dynamic characteristics such as fuzzy, individualized and changing phase, an integrated model for the analysis and prediction of dynamic requirements based on grey system theory was constructed in which data acquisition, multi-attribute decision and trend prediction were regarded as the basic modules. Basic data gathering was completed by taking customer and market competitive factors as the data sources. Then, the importance of customer and technical requirements were analyzed by the grey corelation analysis and their recent trend knowledge were obtained with the GM(1,1) model to achieve the acquisition, analysis and prediction of requirement information in QFD. Finally, feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method were proved by the requirements analysis of large scale air separation system.

Key words: quality function deployment, grey system theory, grey relational analysis, trend prediction, multi-attribute decision making

中图分类号:

N94
TP391

李中凯,，冯毅雄+，谭建荣，方辉,. 基于灰色系统理论的质量屋中动态需求的分析与预测[J]. .

LI Zhong-kai,，FENG Yi-xiong+， TAN Jian-rong，FANG Hui,. Analysis and prediction for dynamic requirements in house of quality based on grey theory[J]. .

[1]	吴若仟,江屏,卢佩宜,张焱焱. 产品设计中基于质量功能配置的需求转化过程[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(5): 1410-1421.
[2]	李锋,陈勇,王家序,汤宝平. 基于强化学习单元匹配循环神经网络的滚动轴承状态趋势预测[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2020, 26(8): 2050-2059.
[3]	张付英,段晶莹,陈建垒,宋娜娜. 面向产品可持续设计的关键功能模块识别方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2019, 25(第7): 1828-1838.
[4]	熊升华,陈振颂,陈勇刚,贺强. 基于指标模糊分割和MULTIMOORA的航空公司机队可靠性识别模型[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2019, 25(第2): 431-438.
[5]	樊佳爽,余隋怀,初建杰,陈健,成方敏,任李金. 工业设计云服务平台下基于用户偏好的设计团队成员优选决策[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2019, 25(第11): 2863-2873.
[6]	杨强,李延来. 基于直觉模糊集的质量屋顾客需求优先度及灵敏度分析[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2018, 24(第4): 978-986.
[7]	李飞,李文强,李彦. 基于双层关联的用户需求重要度计算与转换方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2018, 24(第11): 2836-2845.
[8]	余高锋,李登峰,叶银芳,邱锦明. 考虑后悔规避的异质多属性变权决策方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2017, 23(第1期): 154-161.
[9]	胡东方,郑亚飞,雷若楠. 基于QFD和AIS的复杂产品定制设计[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2016, 22(第9期): 2053-2062.
[10]	周福礼,王旭,林云,何彦东,王敏. 基于F-VIKOR的质量改善部件优先级确定[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2016, 22(第12期): 2809-2818.
[11]	张翠林,王军强,王烁,顾强强. 基于关系传播链的作业车间调度中最优外协工序辨识[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2016, 22(第10期): 2333-2347.
[12]	杨涛,杨育,薛承梦,张雪峰,焦垚. 考虑客户需求偏好的产品创新设计方案多属性决策评价[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2015, 21(第2期): 417-426.
[13]	孙园园,刘飞,李丽. 基于Kano-QFD的个性化产品属性指标重要度确定方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2014, 20(11): 2697-2704.
[14]	李金鹏,李武,岳超源,宋恒力. 权重信息不完全的序数型多属性决策TOPSIS法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2013, 19(06 ): 1408-1413.
[15]	王军强1,2，康永1,2，陈剑1,2，郭银洲1,2，张映锋1,2，孙树栋1,2. 作业车间瓶颈簇识别方法[J]. , 2013, 19 (03 ): 0-0.