不同运作模式的供应链交货动力学行为研究

• 论文 •

不同运作模式的供应链交货动力学行为研究

陈国华，张根保，刘学林，庞继红，张淑慧

1.重庆大学机械学院先进制造技术研究所，重庆400044；2.襄樊学院机械与汽车工程学院，湖北襄阳441053；3.襄樊学院管理学院，湖北襄阳441053

出版日期:2011-01-15 发布日期:2011-01-25

Delivery dynamics behavior of supply chain with various operational modes

CHEN Guo-hua, ZHANG Gen-bao, LIU Xue-lin, PANG Ji-hong, ZHANG Shu-hui

1.Institurion of Advanced Manufacture Technology, School of Mechanical Engineering,Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044;2.School of Mechanical & Auto Engineering Xiangfan University, Xiangyang,441053；3.School of Management, Xiangfan University, Xiangyang, 441053

Online:2011-01-15 Published:2011-01-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究三种模式的供应链对交货率影响的系统行为,将系统动力学方法引入供应链系统行为研究中。根据三种模式供应链的特点,分别建立了系统动力学模型，然后以交货率作为研究对象,在相同参数、市场扰动和政策改变等情况下进行了系统行为的仿真对比分析。结果表明,推式供应链的交货稳定性最差，只有通过改变订货周期才可以提高交货率；拉式供应链对市场的响应表现在整条供应链上最敏感，可以通过改变订货周期或改变目标库存的方式来提高交货率；推拉结合式供应链的优势表现在对最终用户的交货率上，只有通过改变供应商的订货周期才能改变整条供应链的交货率。

关键词: 推动模式, 拉动模式, 推拉结合式, 供应链, 系统动力学, 交货率

Abstract: To study the system behavior of influence on delivery ratio exerted by supply chain with different modes, a new method-Systems Dynamics (SD) was introduced into the analysis of supply chain's behaviors. Three SD models were set up according to various supply chains'characteristics, and then taking delivery ratio as the object, the simulations of three models were performed under the circumstances of the same parameters, disturbances of market and policy shift, respectively. Results indicated：push-supply chain's delivery was the most unstable, and only through adjusting order cycle time, could its delivery ratio be increased. For pull-supply chain, its response to market was the most sensitive in the whole supply chain, and its delivery ratio could be increased by adjusting order cycle time or changing target inventory. The strong point of push & pull-supply chain was its stable and high delivery ratio to the last customers, and its delivery ratio could be increased only by adjusting the suppliers'order cycle time.

Key words: push modes, pull modes, push & pull modes, supply chain, systems dynamics, delivery ratio, Simulation

中图分类号:

陈国华,，张根保，刘学林，庞继红，张淑慧. 不同运作模式的供应链交货动力学行为研究[J]. .

CHEN Guo-hua,, ZHANG Gen-bao, LIU Xue-lin, PANG Ji-hong, ZHANG Shu-hui. Delivery dynamics behavior of supply chain with various operational modes[J]. .

[1]	张念,李会鹏,蹇洁,苏加福. 价格折扣下后悔预期对供应链成员企业定价决策的影响[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(8): 2437-2447.
[2]	李绩才,刘燕飞,楼婷渊,李昌文,周永务. 带有网络直销的双渠道制造商供应链中的定价和广告决策[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(8): 2448-2460.
[3]	谭春桥,李波,周丽. 考虑企业社会责任的物流服务供应链定价决策[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(8): 2461-2475.
[4]	董景峰,高珊,高贵晨,杨若怡. 顾客感知价值和回收质量不确定下的闭环供应链定价决策[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(8): 2476-2490.
[5]	张雪梅,周根贵,曹柬. 考虑政府规制和供应链协调的再制造微分博弈模型[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(7): 2095-2111.
[6]	郭羽含,于俊宇,刘万军,张宇,张美琪. 制造业可持续供应链网络建模及求解[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(7): 2112-2133.
[7]	胡盛强,程硕,王新林. 考虑产出随机的采购策略选择与供应链协调[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(7): 2156-2170.
[8]	孙晋怡,周岩,曲箫宇. 考虑质量和延保服务的多产品供应链网络均衡[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(6): 1833-1842.
[9]	何丽娜,王国涛,刘珏. 基于犹豫模糊DEMATEL与风险屋的供应链风险管理[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(5): 1459-1468.
[10]	戚佛兰,周岩. 考虑渠道公平的双渠道二层供应链网络均衡策略[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(5): 1469-1482.
[11]	王忠伟,尹谦,庞燕,邢立宁,任腾. 再制造闭环供应链回收问题研究进展[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(4): 1201-1210.
[12]	蔡建湖,张玉洁,徐芳,黄卫来. 交货时间不确定环境下两级供应链库存决策与契约设计[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(4): 1211-1225.
[13]	谭乐平,宋平,杨琦峰. 风险规避下基于双向期权的供应链融资与协调[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(3): 912-923.
[14]	聂福海,李电生,肖婷婷. 考虑外源融资的资金约束供应链物流策略[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(3): 924-932.
[15]	蹇洁,郭雨,姜林,苏加福. 基于多目标优化的绿色供应链博弈模型及利润共享契约[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(3): 943-953.